The Power of Perspectives

The Canadian Bar Association
Competition law

Antitrust leniency programs: A disincentive to self-report?

By Yves Faguy July 31, 2017 31 July 2017

Antitrust leniency programs: A disincentive to self-report?

 

Morgan Lewis has a report out showing a major downward trend this year in cartel fines (only US $1.2 billion so far in 2017, compared to $7.8 billion for the full calendar year in 2016). In Canada fines have reached $9.9 in 2017, due to an ongoing automotive parts investigation.

Gabe Friedman reports on why the fines are dropping, in spite of the success of leniency programs adopted around the world over the last decade and a half.  He quotes antitrust partner Clay Everett who suggests that, ironically, the proliferation of leniency programs in different juridictions could be making it more difficult for those companies willing to self-report to be the first in order to secure a promise of immunity:

“There’s been a real surge in enforcement in those types of cases,” said Everett, adding that “a very high percentage of international cartel cases, in the past fifteen years, have been generated through the leniency programs.”

But he said the proliferation of “leniency” programs, and the increased penalties around the world for price-fixing, means that coming forward to self-report a violation now requires a more complicated calculus: There are so many authorities with overlapping jurisdictions, and many cartel members are skeptical that they will receive global credit for being first to self-disclose.

Thus, cartel members must make a strategic calculation about whether self-disclosing and receiving only partial credit is better than staying quiet and hoping authorities never learn about their cartel, Everett said.

Read More
Justice Canada

Justice Canada to overhaul litigation management software

By Justin Ling July 27, 2017 27 July 2017

Justice Canada to overhaul litigation management software

 

The federal Justice Department is on track for a big software update.

It posted a request for information this week, seeking software developers to propose a new solution for their litigation management programs.

That new software, which will replace the current tools, would be designed to search, tag, and preserve documents in various government systems and mark them as relevant for ongoing litigation. The ideal legislation would also be able to archive and crawl webpages, monitor sites for changes, store legal research on the issue, and centralize all relevant information on a chosen case.

The new software would be used to manage workflow and discovery for the 2,000 employees of Justice dealing with some 42,000 litigation cases each year.

The aim is to get the new software online by April, 2020.

Read More
Duty to consult

NEB can fulfill duty to consult, but must do so meaningfully

By Yves Faguy July 26, 2017 26 July 2017

NEB can fulfill duty to consult, but must do so meaningfully

 

The top court handed down two major rulings today on the duty to consult Indigenous communities.

In Clyde River (Hamlet) v. Petroleum Geo‑Services Inc., it quashed a National Energy Board granting authorization to conduct offshore seismic testing for oil and gas off Baffin Island, noting, “No one benefits — not project proponents, not Indigenous peoples, and not non-Indigenous members of affected communities — when projects are prematurely approved only to be subjected to litigation.”

The Crown, it held, can rely on the NEB’s process to fulfill its duty to consult, but in this case the regulatory agency failed to conduct deep consultation:

Read More
International law

The challenges of preventing corporate human right abuses abroad

By Erika Schneidereit July 25, 2017 25 July 2017

The challenges of preventing corporate human right abuses abroad


The protection of human rights is one of the core values that Canadians hold dear. But do Canadian laws do enough to prevent human rights abuses committed overseas?

The challenges posed by this question have become increasingly relevant in a world where Canadian companies control vast operations in multiple countries. This issue has also drawn the attention of international bodies, such as the UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights. 

Earlier this summer, the working group visited Canada to examine issues involving Canadian corporations and human rights. Of particular interest was Canada’s extractive industry (mining and oil and gas) – unsurprisingly, given that more than half of the world’s mining companies call Canada home. While the group wrapped up its visit by applauding Canada for its commitment to addressing business-related human rights issues, it also identified a number of lingering concerns in preventing and remedying human rights abuses committed by Canadian companies operating abroad.

So, what’s so complicated about preventing corporate human right violations abroad?

Read More
Trade

Eliminating NAFTA's chapter 19: A dealbreaker?

By Yves Faguy July 25, 2017 25 July 2017

Eliminating NAFTA's chapter 19: A dealbreaker?

 

Robert Fife and Steven Chase report today that Ottawa is insisting that removing Chapter 19 dispute-resolution panels from the NAFTA accord is a deal-breaker and is prepared to walk away from negotiations if the Trump administration keeps pressing its case on the issue.

Robert Wolfe, in a recent Policy Options piece, wonders whether Canada isn’t simply posturing:

It would be hard for Canada to accept absent an alternative, but no new system could be devised quickly. Canada fought hard for this provision, but has used the current rules only three times in the last decade. Is it worth much to Canada? The answer hinges on why its use has declined. If its existence restrains the use of trade protection measures against Canada (which could be why lobbies like the softwood lumber industry want it eliminated), then taking it away would be a bad idea. Alternatively, as cross-border supply chains grow in importance, maybe trade protection measures that are self-defeating are behind the decline. In sectors of homogenous upstream commodity trade, disputes may not be much of a constraint anyway — softwood may end in another long-term managed trade arrangement. In short, the Canadian strategy may be to make the Americans worry that chapter 19 is a landmine, while being prepared to exchange it for something more important, like relief from Buy American rules.

Read More
Trade

NAFTA: data flows back on the trade agenda

By Justin Ling July 21, 2017 21 July 2017

NAFTA: data flows back on the trade agenda

 

It’s like malware that just keeps coming back.

The removal of data localization restrictions is back on the trade agenda, with the backing of U.S. President Donald Trump.

When the White House released a statement of negotiating objectives for NAFTA trade talks with Canada and Mexico, trade experts welcomed the mostly moderate position it staked out: the U.S. Trade Authority suggested that the expansive continental trade deal ought to remain mostly as-is — albeit with some changes to dispute resolution, duty application for online-shopping, and country-of-origin labelling, as well as on a few other fronts.

But one of the priorities touches upon cross-border data flows.

The administration is hoping to “establish rules to ensure that NAFTA countries do not impose measures that restrict crossborder data flows and do not require the use or installation of local computing facilities.”

 

Read More
Tax

Closing tax loopholes for professionals who incorporate

By Mark Bourrie July 19, 2017 19 July 2017

Closing tax loopholes for professionals who incorporate

 

Canada’s finance minister is taking aim at professionals who use personal corporations to avoid income tax.

Mentioning lawyers and medical doctors specifically, Bill Morneau said the federal treasury is missing out on about $500 million per year because of the way professionals are handling their corporations. There has been an eight-fold increase in the number of corporations created in Canada under federal and provincial laws since 1972, Morneau said.

The minister said the government will close loopholes that all corporation owners to dodge taxes three ways:

Read More
Family Law

A “post-gender”, post-truth look at Canadian family law

By Kerri Froc July 18, 2017 18 July 2017

A “post-gender”, post-truth look at Canadian family law


Post-truth – an adjective defined as ‘relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief’ - Oxford English Dictionaries (Word of the Year for 2016)

As a former family law practitioner, I read with interest Omar Ha-Redeye’s column on “self-represented litigants” and the bias they feel in family law courts.  He writes that while family law has changed “in some ways” to reflect social norms (such as same-sex marriage), in others it hasn’t changed “nearly enough.”  The offending areas of law he points to are support laws (which need to reflect “more partners equitably shar[ing] family responsibilities and society moves away from the traditional sole-breadwinner model,”) and child custody (to rid it of “perceived” gender bias and “credence given to false allegations of abuse,” among other things).  Of course, when he is writing about self-represented litigants here, the context makes clear this is a code phrase for men.

The notion that there is gender bias against men in family law matters is not new.  Ha-Redeye notes that “litigants” (presumably fathers’ rights advocates) made this claim before the Special Joint Committee on Child Custody and Access, which reported in December 1998.  However, the committee found no gender bias, only that fathers who testified “perceived” there was bias.  Nevertheless, the committee at times seemed to treat the perception as if it were reality, resulting in a report that that Professor Nicholas Bala calls “not well written,” having a “’pro father’ slant’” and failing to reflect the reality of how judges were adjudicating cases.

Read More
Indigenous law

Sustainable development as a moral obligation tied to aboriginal title

By Supriya Tandan July 17, 2017 17 July 2017

Sustainable development as a moral obligation tied to aboriginal title

 

It would be fitting were the Prime Minister to name an Indigenous person to fill Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin's seat after she steps down in December. 

After all, it was under her tenure that the Supreme Court of Canada took great pains to strengthen indigenous rights, relying in large part on honour and reconciliation as the twin moral obligations that should guide Canada in its stewardship of certain lands. In her court’s later years, it appears to have added a third that could change how we view our collective responsibility in terms of owning land: sustainability.

The Crown draws its power to manage lands via the sovereignty proclamation. However this power is not absolute and in the words of the court, is “burdened” by land that belongs to aboriginal communities.

Read More
The Supreme Court

SCC appointment process: tradition of regional representation respected

By CBA/ABC National July 17, 2017 17 July 2017

SCC appointment process: tradition of regional representation respected

The appointments process is now open to select the next justice of the Supreme Court of Canada who will fill retiring of Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin’s seat.

As was the case in 2016, when Justice Malcolm Rowe was appointed, an independent and non-partisan Advisory Board will be formed to identify candidates suitable for the position.

What’s different this time around is that the appointments process now explicitly recognizes regional convention, meaning that it open only to candidates from British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba, Northwest Territories, Nunavut, and Yukon. The Chief Justice initially appointed as a Puisne Justice in 1989 from the Supreme Court of British Columbia. Traditionally, two seats are held by Western Canada.  Justice Russell Brown is currently the other member of the top court from the region.

“Honouring regional representation means that our highest court will continue to represent all regions of Canada,” CBA President René Basque said in a statement.

In June, Basque wrote to the government to reiterate the CBA’s request that the government uphold the convention of regional representation as a core element of diversity

Read More
CBA Futures

Legal futures round-up

By Yves Faguy July 14, 2017 14 July 2017

Legal futures round-up

 

Inspired by the CBA Legal Futures report on Transforming the Delivery of Legal Services in Canada, here’s our regular round-up of noteworthy developments, opinions and news in the legal futures space as a means of furthering discussion about our changing legal marketplace.

To kick things off, here’s an issue law firms are going to have to seriously address: their security weak spots. A recent study reveals that there is a “widespread lack of cybersecurity in law firms" and reports that  two-thirds of the 200 responding law firms had reported some sort of cyber breach. Also worrisome, many don’t have cybersecurity insurance.

That report was released as news hit that global law firm DLA Piper suffered a major cyber attack -- yet another a reminder that law firms are a choice target for hackers.

Some firms are taking the threat seriously. International immigration services firm Fragomen announced it is opening an immigration technology innovation lab in Pittsburgh, to be staffed with 40-50 professional – none of them lawyers. The office is going to be focused on software development and cybersecurity.

On the technology front, Julie Sobowale explores blockchain and what it means for legal professionals.  Here’s a hint: Smart contracts, which explains why AIG is teaming up with IBM “to develop a "smart" insurance policy that uses blockchain to manage complex international coverage.”

Read More
CBA Influence

Working the convention: Regional representation on the SCC, please

By Kim Covert July 13, 2017 13 July 2017

Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin’s announcement in June that she will be retiring at the end of 2017 means the government will soon start the process to fill her seat on the Supreme Court. Once again, the CBA is asking the government make an appointment based on merit, ensuring that the court reflects the full diversity of Canada’s regions, legal systems and population.

McLachlin’s seat on the court is one of the two traditionally held by Western Canada. The jury is out, however, on whether that seat should go to a jurist from British Columbia, which is where the Alberta-born McLachlin was a sitting judge before her appointment to the Supreme Court, or to any of the four provinces west of Ontario.

Read More

Current Issue

Editor's Picks

Google's US court challenge to SCC "repugnant" order

Editor's Picks

Closing tax loopholes for professionals who incorporate

Editor's Picks

Copyright fees at York: Federal Court rejects fair dealing

National TV

  • Thumb

    CBA's intervention in Lloyd v. R

  • Thumb

    Margaret Hagan on the role law schools can play in fostering innovation

  • Thumb

    Melina Buckley on the importance of legal aid benchmarks in Canada

View All Videos

Partners In Your Success